Reimagining the Power of One Billion Dollars
“What would you do with a billion dollars to combat
economic inequality?” asked Chris Anderson, head of TED, at the closing
session of this year’s conference.
More specifically: “how would you audaciously reinvest that amount of
money to best help the world’s 3.5 billion poorest people?” he probed.
Having just heard the new director of MIT’s Media Lab, Joi Ito, present the Labs’ latest approach to innovation—“Deploy or Die”—I was inspired to answer the question.Bottom-Up Innovation
Joi’s new motto underscores the need for more than just
tech demos to change the world. To make them truly count, we must put
our technology innovations into the hands of real people and see what
actually works.
Technology has advanced to a point where it is easy to
do so. Whether it’s software, hardware, or even biotech, the cost of
prototyping and deploying new tools, then adapting them and iterating,
is now extremely low.
As I previously described in a Huffington Post op-ed, it
was then that the idea struck me. What if we applied Joi’s agile,
bottom-up innovation approach to the global development challenge posed
by Chris? What if we invest philanthropic capital in creating products
that are geared towards the underprivileged, in their customer-focused
deployment, and in scaling those tools that prove to work best?
I believe such an investment in technology-for-good
innovations could open up new frontiers for tackling the toughest
problems of the world’s poorest populations, from poverty to disease to
social injustice. Let me explain.
What could a billion dollars do?
For one, it could scale Joi Ito’s approach by creating a Media Lab-style network whose goal would be to build
and deploy hundreds of technology solutions customized to the needs of
the bottom billions of humanity. We’d pick projects that had the
opportunity for a five- or 10-fold improvement in results, or might
revolutionize the way people do something. The solutions that catch fire
with their intended users would then be scaled up.
Why is this idea exciting? Because it inverts the power
structure and pushes innovation to the edges. By making technology
applications suitable and relevant to the lives of the world’s poorest
people, we can advance a future in which everyone has a fair shot at
sharing in the abundance created by today’s accelerating technologies.
Moreover, since the nature of technology is such that it
comes instrumented for measurement, this approach also supports the
development of best practices in the delivery of social outcomes, which
is essential in order to create meaningful, lasting change.
The Innovation Bucket List
Based on conversations I’ve had with groups dedicated to
applying innovative solutions to the needs of the bottom half of
humanity, here is a very partial list of what we could possibly do:
- Exposing corruption: Help the fight against large-scale public corruption, which is so damaging to the poor, by marshaling the power of citizens to shine light on corrupt anonymous corporations and their beneficial owners—one of the goals of this year’s TED Prize Winner, Global Witness’ Charmian Gooch.
- Self-assessment for the poor: Empower the poor to improve their lives with a simple assessment tool, the Poverty Stoplight, invented in Paraguay that helps them assess their poverty with 50 simple questions with three pictures showing the possible answers. This empowers each individual to set his or her own priorities rather than one-size-fits-all aid programs.
- Empower Medical Paraprofessionals: Ensure that a simple tool providing step-by-step medical emergency instructions was in the hands of every medical paraprofessional on the planet, saving untold lives in developing countries.
- Solve the problem of access to printed information by the world’s blind: By putting the right tools into the hands of this traditionally underserved population, we could ensure that blindness is no longer a barrier to education, employment or social inclusion.
Technology for Good
The list could go on and on. These ideas aren’t mine: they are the ideas that come to our team at Benetech, a Silicon Valley nonprofit technology company that I founded.
We build software applications focused exclusively on
addressing unmet social needs and see hundreds of ideas for tech
applications for good for each one that we can create. Imagine how many
millions of lives would be improved—even transformed—if the
technology-for-good movement had the freedom to build and deploy
hundreds of best-of-breed products specifically designed to address
these complex social problems.
Now is the time to apply an agile approach to
innovation—Joi Ito’s “Deploy or Die” at scale, if you will—to social
sector problems. For in this After Internet era, as Joi calls
it, information technology is touching all aspects of society. Every
area—whether health, poverty, education, human rights or the
environment—is now information technology and thus can be improved
with the right technology tools.
Innovate, Connect, Adapt
Now don’t get me wrong: technology alone is no panacea
for humanity’s toughest problems. And building technology solutions for
the social sector isn’t purely an office-desk business based on the
thrill of empowering people in principle.
Years of working closely with partners on the ground in
often-difficult situations –including people with disabilities and
at-risk human rights defenders – have taught us that we must get out
there and truly understand the people we
aspire to help and the contexts in which they live and operate. We must
also treat our beneficiaries as customers and partners in social
change, not as passive recipients of charity.
These principles themselves—innovate, connect and
adapt—aren’t new. They are at the core of the Silicon Valley venture
world and the technology revolution. What’s new and timely is the
opportunity to apply them globally with philanthropic support by making
technology suitable and relevant to the lives of the world’s most
underprivileged communities.
What if we brought the power that creates so much wealth
in the tech community to bear on the inequality challenge? If we can do
that, it could be the best and most powerful billion dollars ever
spent!
This post originally appeared on CSRwire TalkBack.
Comments